Himanta Biswa Sarma’s Strong Response to Muhammad Yunus’s Remark: ‘7 States of India Are Landlocked’
Renowned Bangladeshi economist and Nobel Laureate Muhammad Yunus recently made a statement that sparked controversy across India. He claimed that seven states of India are landlocked and thus face economic and developmental challenges. This remark did not sit well with Indian authorities and experts, who were quick to counter his argument with facts and strong rebuttals.
India’s Geographic and Economic Strength
India’s response to Yunus’s claim highlights the nation’s vast and diversified economic structure. While it is true that seven states—Bihar, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, and Haryana—do not have direct access to the sea, they are far from being economically handicapped.
Infrastructure Development
The Indian government has heavily invested in infrastructure projects that connect landlocked states to major trade routes. The Dedicated Freight Corridor (DFC) and Golden Quadrilateral highway network ensure seamless connectivity, allowing industries and businesses in these states to thrive. Moreover, airports, inland waterways, and railway networks play a vital role in mitigating geographical limitations.
Industrial Growth and Economic Contribution
Some of India’s largest industries, including automobile manufacturing, steel production, agriculture, and IT services, are based in these landlocked states. For instance:
- Uttar Pradesh is one of India’s largest agricultural producers and a major hub for small-scale industries.
- Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are rich in natural resources, with thriving mining and energy sectors.
- Rajasthan is renowned for its tourism and gemstone industries, contributing significantly to the national GDP.
Inland Connectivity and Ports
India has developed inland water transport and dry ports to facilitate trade for landlocked states. Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (JNPT), Kolkata Port, and Mundra Port are all linked to these states via extensive road and rail networks, reducing the disadvantages of not having a coastline.
Diplomatic and Economic Perspective
Indian diplomats and economists argue that Yunus’s comment oversimplifies a complex issue. Unlike completely landlocked nations, these Indian states benefit from strong federal policies, economic corridors, and an extensive trade network with neighboring regions. The government’s Make in India and Atmanirbhar Bharat initiatives have further propelled industrial and economic growth across these states.
Conclusion
India’s response to Muhammad Yunus’ statement underscores the resilience and strength of its economic model. While geographical constraints do pose challenges, India has effectively overcome them with strategic infrastructure, policy initiatives, and industrial development. The landlocked states of India are not isolated; they are well-integrated into the national and global economy, proving that location alone does not determine economic success.
By BHARAT GLOBAL TIME
