Protests have erupted across India in response to the recently passed Waqf (Amendment) Bill, leading to significant political and social debates.
Key Provisions of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill:
- The bill proposes the inclusion of non-Muslim members in the central Waqf Council.
- It grants the government authority to determine the ownership of disputed waqf properties.
- Supporters argue these measures aim to reduce corruption and enhance transparency in the management of waqf properties.
Criticism and Concerns:
- Opponents, including Muslim organizations and opposition parties like the Congress, view the bill as a violation of constitutional rights and an infringement on religious autonomy.
- There are fears that the bill could lead to the seizure of historically significant religious properties lacking formal documentation.
Recent Protests:
- On March 17, 2025, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) organized a protest at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar, labeling the bill a “direct attack” on Muslims and expressing concerns over potential misappropriation of waqf properties.
- In Karnataka’s Gulbarga, the Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI) held demonstrations, tearing copies of the bill and condemning it as unconstitutional.
- The West Bengal Jamiat-e-Ulama also protested, calling the bill an “attack on the Constitution” and criticizing the lack of consultation with state governments.
Congress Party’s Legal Actions:
- The Congress party has filed pleas in the Supreme Court, challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill. They argue that the bill violates the rights of the Muslim community and undermines federal principles.
Government’s Position:
- Union Minister Kiren Rijiju defends the bill, stating it aims to improve property management and reduce corruption. He emphasizes that the amendments are intended to benefit all, including disadvantaged groups.
Current Status:
- The bill has passed both houses of Parliament and awaits President Droupadi Murmu’s assent to become law. The controversy surrounding the bill continues to fuel nationwide debates on religious rights, property management, and constitutional governance.
