Bharat Global Time | June 12, 2025
In a case that has shaken the legal fraternity, the Supreme Court of India has refused to quash criminal proceedings against a sitting High Court judge accused of the sexual abuse of his minor daughter. The apex court emphasized that serious allegations involving a child victim require full legal scrutiny and cannot be dismissed at the threshold stage.
What Happened?
The petitioner, a High Court judge (identity withheld for legal reasons), had approached the Supreme Court seeking to quash an FIR registered under the POCSO Act (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences). The judge claimed the case was false, fabricated, and part of a personal vendetta by his estranged spouse.
However, the Supreme Court bench, led by Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice Sandeep Mehta, refused to interfere, stating:
“The allegations are grave in nature and involve a vulnerable minor. This court cannot act as an investigating agency at this stage.”
Allegations in Brief
According to the FIR filed in 2023:
- The minor daughter made a detailed statement alleging sexual abuse by her father
- The mother supported the complaint and sought police protection for the child
- The accused judge denied all allegations, terming them part of a “custody battle smear campaign”
Legal Battle So Far
- Trial Court: Took cognizance of the FIR; issued summons
- High Court: Refused to grant interim relief
- Supreme Court: Declined to quash the case, ordered no interference until charges are examined in trial
The SC bench reiterated that under the POCSO Act, such cases must be handled with utmost sensitivity and procedural rigor, and prima facie evidence must be examined in trial court.
What This Means for Judiciary
This development has sent shockwaves through the legal community. While the judiciary is presumed to be above reproach, this case underlines that no individual is immune from the rule of law — not even a sitting judge.
Senior advocate Indira Jaising commented:
“This is a test for the judiciary — not just in delivering justice, but in showing that justice applies equally to all, regardless of position.”
The Child’s Safety Comes First
The Supreme Court has also directed the State Child Welfare Committee (CWC) to ensure the minor’s protection, with regular updates submitted to the family court.
The next hearing in the trial court is scheduled for July 8, 2025.
Public Reaction & Media Ethics
The story has generated massive public debate, but legal experts have cautioned against media trials. The identity of the child and the accused are protected under POCSO confidentiality clauses.
Citizens are urged to avoid circulating unverified claims on social media that could harm the child or derail the trial process.
Final Word: A Case That Demands Justice, Not Sensation
The Supreme Court’s refusal to quash the case sends a powerful message:
Position cannot shield anyone from accountability, especially when a child’s safety is at stake.
As the trial unfolds, all eyes will be on whether India’s justice system can uphold truth, transparency, and trust — even when its own members are in the dock.
